One that is sealed with a nice wet one...

Power of attorney

Wedding License

I'm with Sam Shueh on this one.  

I'm all about e-signing.

No, I would hate to reverse course when a digital signature has saved so much time and effort in an already tedious process.

No, not to sell.  I think mortgage & note docs should.

Only those that are notarized.

good read

Jack Lewitz wins with his response.  

Nah, it's the 21st century - I'm good with electronic

Follow the rules in your area.

Sally K. & David L. Hanson - not t(

Any that require a Notary.

I love eSign but it doesn't work for all documents. If a document must be notarized, the person must appear before the Notary so it would have to be a wet signature vs. eSign. Other than that, it's eSign for me.

I think the deed should still have wet signatures and acknowledgements as the notary is attesting to the indentiy of the signers. 

I like them all that way.  Electronic sigs could be done by a family member unlawfully

Power of attorney

A personal check.

I am old school but it seems like electronic signatures are here to stay. I do think that closing docs such as mortgages and deeds should have a "wet" signature or be signed by someone with a power of attorney.

In this day and age, only the grant deed... at least for real estate.

Deed

Sally K. & David L. Hanson I think Richard Weeks makes a good point about wet signatures required for documents that have to be notarized.

I would still say mortgage doc's should be.

I have had lender docs requiring wet signatures. Escrow now seems to be ok in general with electronic

Sally I would like to see all 'wet sigs' for goodness sakes. But we have to deal with the few docs that still need wet sig. Maybe at some point in the future they'll get over their reasoning why wet sigs are critical.