Do you think the Salt River Horses should get to stay or be removed by the Forest Service?

Question

Brian England, MBA, GRI, REALTOR® Real Estate in East Valley AZ (Ambrose Realty Management LLC)

Answers Subscribe to Answers

Sort

Rainmaker
784,786

The Woodland Team of Texas

The Woodland Companies - Austin, TX

Land Specialists

A tough balance between the rights of grazers and those of the people who enjoy wild horses.

Oct 20, 2018 01:36 AM

Upvote

2

Bob Crane

Stevens Point, WI
Brian England

Gilbert, AZ

Rainmaker
2,224,473

Debbie Laity

Cedaredge Land Company - Cedaredge, CO

Your Real Estate Resource for Delta County, CO

I hope they get to stay.

Aug 05, 2015 03:08 PM

Upvote

1

Brian England

Gilbert, AZ

Rainer
67,369

Evelyn M Epperson

Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage - Johns Creek, GA

A Tradition Of [Excellence, Trust & Service]

There is a federal law that wild can run wild but the federal government wants to rent federal land so cattle can graze. The feds are selling the wild horses to people who want to save these horse. It is disgusting what the feds are doing to these horses. I have a horse named Dakota so I have a clue.

Aug 05, 2015 08:15 AM

Upvote

1

Brian England

Gilbert, AZ

Rainer
420,003

Caroline Gerardo

Licensed in 20 states - Newport Beach, CA

C. G. Barbeau the Loan Lady nmls 324982

The herd has been there 400 years - there's 65 or so horses. The Forest Service is motivated byland developers. Each horse has been named and tracked by conservationists. The horses are healthy and no risk to land, habitat, people or hazard. They graze on grass that is not native and help prevent fires. When they are "rounded up" they are shot, dragged by their legs and it is a gruesome site.

Aug 05, 2015 04:42 AM

Upvote

1

Brian England

Gilbert, AZ

Rainmaker
2,784,716

Richie Alan Naggar

people first...then business Ran Right Realty - Riverside, CA

agent & author

Stay as in WHOA here...Leave nature alone is my stance.

Aug 05, 2015 04:27 AM

Upvote

1

Brian England

Gilbert, AZ

Rainmaker
1,728,256

Sandy Padula & Norm Padula, JD, GRI

HomeSmart Realty West & Florida Realty Investments - , CA

Presence, Persistence & Perseverance

The herd should be thinned but held out for adoption, not slaughter.

Aug 05, 2015 01:22 AM

Upvote

1

Brian England

Gilbert, AZ

Ambassador
6,418,440

Bob Crane

Woodland Management Service / Woodland Real Estate, KW Diversified - Stevens Point, WI

Forestland Experts! 715-204-9671

So how did this turn out Brian?

Nov 19, 2018 08:16 PM

Upvote

Back to Top

A tough balance between the rights of grazers and those of the people who enjoy wild horses.
There is a federal law that wild can run wild but the federal government wants to rent federal land so cattle can graze. The feds are selling the wild horses to people who want to save these horse. It is disgusting what the feds are doing to these horses. I have a horse named Dakota so I have a clue.
The herd has been there 400 years - there's 65 or so horses. The Forest Service is motivated byland developers. Each horse has been named and tracked by conservationists. The horses are healthy and no risk to land, habitat, people or hazard. They graze on grass that is not native and help prevent fires. When they are "rounded up" they are shot, dragged by their legs and it is a gruesome site.
The herd should be thinned but held out for adoption, not slaughter.